Calcutta High Court
FAT/348/2024 of MANOJ BHATTACHARYA Vs JOY DUTTA on 29 July 2026
2026. MNS. FAT No. 348 of 2024 Sri Manoj Bhattacharya Vs. Joy Dutta 1. In the order dated July 13, 2026, the caption of the order erroneously mentioned the appeal as “FA No. 348 of 2024” instead of “FAT No. 348 of 2024”. 2. Let the caption be read as “FAT No. 348 of
D/L.4.
July 29, 2026.
MNS.
FAT No. 348 of 2024
Sri Manoj Bhattacharya
Vs.
Joy Dutta
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In the order dated July 13, 2026, the caption of the order erroneously mentioned the appeal as “FA No. 348 of 2024” instead of “FAT No. 348 of 2024”.
2. Let the caption be read as “FAT No. 348 of 2024”.
3. On July 13, 2026, this Court had considered an Office report dated July 10, 2026, from which it appeared that Special Messenger costs had not been put in by the appellant as per the direction of this Court and a further fortnight’s time was given to the appellant to put in such Special Messenger costs; in default, the matter was to be listed under the heading “Lawazima for Final Orders”, under which heading it is appearing today.
4. From the revised report dated July 28, 2026, we find that such costs have also not been deposited within the extended period.
5. Accordingly, FAT No. 348 of 2024 is dismissed for non-compliance of the Court’s direction.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
7. There will be no order as to costs.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.) (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)