Calcutta High Court
MAT/201/2026 of UMA BHAUMIK BARMAN Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS on 24 July 2026
Item No.22 AP MAT 201 of 2026 With CAN 1 of 2026 With CAN 2 of 2026 Uma Bhaumik Barman Vs. The State of West Bengal and Ors. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury … For the Appellant. Mr. S.K. Roy … For the SSC. Re.: CAN 1 of 2026 1. CAN 1 of 2026 has been filed seeking condonation of delay
24.07.2026
Court No.13
Item No.22
AP
MAT 201 of 2026
With
CAN 1 of 2026
With
CAN 2 of 2026
Uma Bhaumik Barman
Vs.
The State of West Bengal and Ors.
Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury
… For the Appellant.
Mr. S.K. Roy
… For the SSC.
Re.: CAN 1 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CAN 1 of 2026 has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 472 days.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing of the appeal is condoned.
3. Accordingly, CAN 1 of 2026 is allowed. Re.: MAT 201 of 2026 With CAN 2 of 2026
4. The short question that comes for consideration in this instant appeal is whether in the impugned order dated 1st October, 2024 the Single Bench would have deferred the transfer of the writ petitioner/appellant until a replacement to man the post of the writ petitioner/ appellant is found by nearby school.
5. This Court has decided the matter applying the ratio of Rupak Dhua Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. being judgement dated 31st July, 2025 and other decisions that the teachers for whom transfer is approved by the authorities need not wait till such time replacement is found.
6. In the light of the above, the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Murshidabad shall forward the writ petitioner’s/appellant’s application to the School Service Commission for appropriate orders and simultaneously thereafter find a replacement in the resultant vacancy as expeditiously as possible.
7. The impugned order shall stand modified accordingly.
8. Hence, MAT
of is disposed of. Consequently, CAN 2 of 2026 is also disposed of.
9. There shall be no order as to costs.
10. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)