Calcutta High Court
WPA(P)/306/2026 of SUSHANTA BHUNE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 22 July 2026
Sl. No.18 Court No.1 s.biswas WPA(P) 306 of 2026 Sushanta Bhune vs. The State of West Bengal and others Mr. Suddhadev Adak Ms. Richa Pramanik Mr. Samrat Hoque ... for the petitioner Mr. Ajit Kumar Mishra, AGP Mr. Gopal Krishna Sarkar Mr. Milind Mohul Ghosh ... for the State Ms. Sonal Sinha Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
July 22, 2026 Sl. No.18 Court No.1 s.biswas
WPA(P) 306 of 2026
Sushanta Bhune vs. The State of West Bengal and others
Mr. Suddhadev Adak Ms. Richa Pramanik Mr. Samrat Hoque ... for the petitioner Mr. Ajit Kumar Mishra, AGP Mr. Gopal Krishna Sarkar Mr. Milind Mohul Ghosh ... for the State Ms. Sonal Sinha Mr. Sandipan Das Ms. Kazi Tania Parveen ... for the PCB Mr. Anindya Bose Mr. Krishan Ray Ms. Isita Kundu Ms. Raina Das ... for the respondent nos.11 & 12
In course of hearing, Ms. Sinha, learned advocate appearing for the West Bengal Pollution Control Board, produces an order passed by the Assistant Environmental Engineer, P.G. Cell, West Bengal Pollution Control Board, and submits that an order has been passed directing the private respondents not to carry on any poultry farming activity at the present location. She further submits that the Officer-in-Charge of the jurisdictional police station has also been directed to ensure that the private respondents do not carry on any such poultry farming activity at the said location. Let the said order, as produced on behalf of the West Bengal Pollution Control Board, be retained with the record. Copies thereof have been handed over to the private respondents and the petitioner.
2 Therefore, in view of the fact that the West Bengal Pollution Control Board has already taken appropriate steps in the matter, we are not inclined to interfere in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Needless to observe, the private respondent nos. 11 and 12 shall be at liberty to challenge the said order before the appropriate forum, if so advised and in accordance with law.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, A.C.J.)