Calcutta High Court
CPAN/2078/2025 of MD. MASIDUR RAHAMAN AND ORS. Vs SHAILENDRA UTTAM, THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR (E.R.) AND ORS. on 17 July 2026
Item No.8 Ali ct. no.9 CPAN 2078 of 2025 Md. Masidur Rahaman & Ors. Vs. Shri Shailendra Uttam, The Regional Director (E.R.) & Ors. In WPA 23407 of 2025 Atish Mandal & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Debasish Kundu, Mr. Sudeepto Kumar Basu, Mr. Bidan Modak ……
17.07.2026
Item No.8
Ali
ct. no.9
CPAN 2078 of 2025
Md. Masidur Rahaman & Ors.
Vs.
Shri Shailendra Uttam, The Regional Director (E.R.) & Ors.
In
WPA 23407 of 2025
Atish Mandal & Ors.
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Debasish Kundu,
Mr. Sudeepto Kumar Basu,
Mr. Bidan Modak
…… for the petitioners.
Mr. Indrajit Dasgupta,
Mr. Tapan Bhanja,
Mr. Gourab Karmakar
…..for the respondents/alleged contemnors.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocates for the parties are present.
2. The contemnors/respondents have filed affidavit of compliance of the order passed by this Court in terms of direction dated 03.07.2026.
3. The learned advocate for the petitioners does not dispute with regard to compliance of this order and it is submitted that the writ petitioners were permitted to appear in the medical examination and declared to be fit.
4. In the facts and circumstances, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this application.
2
5. Thus, this contempt application stands disposed. The authority shall proceed in accordance with law.
(Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)