Calcutta High Court

WPA/21495/2024 of SK HAFIJUDDIN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2024 A . Roy,J. Form J(2) Sl. No. 37 AB In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Roy W.P.A. 21495 of 2024 Sk. Hafijuddin Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. For the petitioner : Mr. Kaushik Sarkar For the State

A. Roy,J.

Form J(2)

Sl. No. 37

AB

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

W.P.A. 21495 of 2024

Sk. Hafijuddin

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

For the petitioner

:

Mr. Kaushik Sarkar

For the State

:

none appears

For respondent no. 8 & 9 :

Sk. Sahjahan Ali

Heard on

:

July 17, 2026

Judgment on :

:

July 17, 2026

[ IN COURT ]

Aniruddha Roy,J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This is an assigned writ petition.

2. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.

3. Mr. Kaushik Sarkar, learned advocate appears for the petitioner.

4. Sk. Sahjahan Ali, learned advocate appears for private respondent nos. 8 and 9.

5. Rest of the respondents are not represented.

6. Petitioner alleges an unauthorized and illegal construction on the subject land at the behest of the private respondent nos. 8 and 9, within the

A.Roy,J.

jurisdiction of the concerned Gram Panchayat which has been impleaded through its Secretary being respondent no. 5.

7. Petitioner has submitted a representation dated July 6, 2024, annexure P-3 at page 19 to the writ petition before the Pradhan of the concerned Gram Panchayat but the same has not yet been disposed of.

8. In view of the above, the Pradhan of the concerned Gram Panchayat shall upon issuing a prior hearing notice of at least seven days to the petitioner and the private respondent nos. 8 and 9 and after granting them an opportunity of hearing shall dispose of the said representation dated July 6, 2024 at page 19 to the writ petition, by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law.

9. While disposing of the said representation the Pradhan shall also consider the relevant record including the document dated August 5, 2024, annexure P-2 at page 18 to the writ petition. The Pradhan shall also consider the relevant land records by seeking assistance from the respondent no. 6, if necessary.

10. The entire exercise shall be carried out and completed by the Pradhan of the Panchayat positively within eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. The reasoned order then shall be communicated to the petitioner and the private respondent nos. 8 and 9 positively within a further period of two weeks from the date of the said reasoned order to be passed.

A.Roy,J.

11. Learned advocate appearing for the private respondents submits that, previously a Title Suit was filed by the petitioner which has been dismissed for default on September 19, 2022 and the petitioner did not take any step thereafter. He submits that, the land has been converted into bastu. He further submits that, the concerned Panchayat Samity has sanctioned a building plan at the relevant point of time.

12. After hearing the submissions of the parties, it appears to this Court that, the Civil Suit alleged to have been filed had been dismissed on the ground of default and therefore the suit has no existence in the eye of law.

13. It is made clear that, this order shall be restricted only in the event of an alleged unauthorized and illegal construction and not on any other form of encroachment.

14. It is further made clear that, this Court has not gone into the merits of the rival contentions of the parties and the Pradhan of the concerned Panchayat shall scrutinize all the records and then pass its reasoned order as directed herein.

15. In the event, the reasoned order confirms existence of any unauthorized and illegal construction on the subject land, the appropriate jurisdictional authority shall take immediate steps to remove and demolish such illegal and unauthorized construction, if any, strictly in accordance with law but positively within six weeks from the date of the said reasoned order to be passed.

A.Roy,J.

16. This order shall not create any right or equity in favour of the petitioner if the petitioner is found otherwise not eligible in support of his prayer, in accordance with law.

17. Since affidavits are not called for, the allegations made in this writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents.

18. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition being W.P.A. 21495 of 2024 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs.

30. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished expeditiously.

(Aniruddha Roy, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead