Calcutta High Court

MAT/1461/2025 of SHYAMOLI TRIPATY AND ORS. Vs ANUP BAKSHI AND ORS. on 14 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No. 12 Item No. 10 Sandip IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE M.A.T. 1461 of 2025 I.A. No : CAN 3 of 2026 Shyamol Tripaty & Ors. -Versus- Sri Anup Bakshi & Ors. Mr. Golam Mastafa, Mr. Samirul Sardar …..for the appellants. Ms. Susmita

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

14.07.2026 Court No. 12 Item No. 10 Sandip IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE M.A.T. 1461 of 2025 I.A. No : CAN 3 of 2026 Shyamol Tripaty & Ors.

-Versus-

Sri Anup Bakshi & Ors. Mr. Golam Mastafa, Mr. Samirul Sardar …..for the appellants. Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta, AGP, Mr. Niladri Saha ….for the State.

Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the appellants is taken on record. Apart from the state respondent, none appears for the other respondents, despite service. Re : CAN 3 of 2026

CAN 3 of 2026 is an application for restoration of M.A.T. 1461 of 2025, which was dismissed for default on May 18, 2026.

Considering the averments in Paragraphs 5 to 7 of the said application, we are satisfied with the explanation as to why the appellants could not be present before the Court when the matter was called on and dismissed for default. Accordingly, CAN 3 of 2026 is allowed.

M.A.T. 1461 of 2025 and the connected applications are restored to its original file and number. Re : CAN 1 of 2025

CAN 1 of 2025 is an application for condonation of delay of 180 days in preferring the appeal.

Upon perusal of the averments made in paragraphs 1 and 2, we are satisfied that the delay has been sufficiently explained.

The delay is condoned.

The appeal is registered.

Accordingly, CAN 1 of 2025 is allowed. Re : MAT 1461 of 2025

The appellants are aggrieved by the order dated January 17, 2024 passed in W.P.A. 131 of 2025.

We find that the learned single Judge directed the Block Development Officer, Daspur –II Block to consider and dispose of the representation of the respondent nos. 1 and 2 dated December 12, 2024.

From the writ petition, it appears that the representation dated December 12, 2024 was an application under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act addressed to the Pradhan of No. 5 Chaipat Gram Panchayat. It was filed by the advocate of the respondent nos. 1 and 2.

An order was passed, directing the Block Development Officer to dispose of the said application.

We find the order of His Lordship to be innocuous. The Pradhan (SPIO) did not dispose of the application under the Right to Information Act. The Block Development Officer was directed to dispose of the said application. Thus, no interference is called for in this appeal. However, Mr. Mastafa submits that pursuant to the disposal of the writ petition, the concerned Block Development Officer has held that the appellants’ construction is unauthorized and directed demolition thereof. It is also submitted that the Panchayat

Authority has acted on the basis of such direction.

We are of the view that subsequent actions taken by the Block Development Officer and panchayat authorities, which are alleged before us, cannot be interfered with in the appeal. The cause of action is subsequent. The appellants are at liberty to take steps in accordance with law, by challenging the decision of the Block Development Officer and/or panchayat authorities.

Accordingly, the appeal and the connected application are disposed of with the above observations. We have not considered the issue on merits and leave it open for adjudication by the proper forum.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead