Calcutta High Court
WPCRC/160/2026 of SAMAD MIR AND ORS Vs DEBABRATA CHAKRABORTY THE PRADHAN KISMAT NAIKUNDI GRAM PANCHAYAT on 13 July 2026
Court. No. 12 GB/Asraf WPCRC 160 of 2026 In WPA 27253 of 2022 Samad Mir & Ors. VS Debabrata Chakraborty Mr. Kananilal Samanta … for the Applicants. Mr. Dababrata Chakraborty, the Pradhan of Kismat Naikundi Gram Panchayat is present in Court in response to the Rule. It appears
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Item No.3 13.07.2026 Court. No. 12
GB/Asraf
WPCRC 160 of 2026 In WPA 27253 of 2022
Samad Mir & Ors. VS Debabrata Chakraborty
Mr. Kananilal Samanta … for the Applicants.
Mr. Dababrata Chakraborty, the Pradhan of Kismat Naikundi Gram Panchayat is present in Court in response to the Rule. It appears that the order of this Court has been complied with by the panchayat authorities. Under such circumstances, nothing remains to be decided in the contempt application. Accordingly, personal appearance of the alleged contemnor is dispensed with. The contempt proceedings are dropped. Contempt application is disposed of. Rule discharged. Disposal of the contempt application will not prevent the applicant from challenging the order passed by the authority, before the appropriate Court of law. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)