Calcutta High Court
WPCRC/124/2026 of SK FIROJ ALI Vs SAMSER MOLLICK THE PRADHAN KOTALPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT on 10 July 2026
Sl.No. 03 Court No. 12 Cp WPCRC 124 of 2026 Arising out of WPA/4804/2023 SK. FIROJ ALI VS SAMSER MOLLICK THE PRADHAN, KOTALPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT Mr. S. M. Ismail Mr. Mukteswar Maiti Ms. Monika Sarkar …… for the applicant. Mr. Quazi Monirul Islam …..for the alleged contemnor.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
10.07.2026 Sl.No. 03 Court No. 12 Cp WPCRC 124 of 2026 Arising out of WPA/4804/2023
SK. FIROJ ALI VS SAMSER MOLLICK THE PRADHAN, KOTALPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT
Mr. S. M. Ismail Mr. Mukteswar Maiti Ms. Monika Sarkar …… for the applicant.
Mr. Quazi Monirul Islam
…..for the alleged contemnor.
The pradhan is present today in court. He files the affidavit of compliance. The reasoned order that has been passed by the panchayat authorities indicates that conversion of the land was made prior to the construction and the permission for construction of the shop was also given prior to the construction. Learned advocate for the applicant denies these factual submissions and relies on other documents. In this contempt proceeding it is not possible for this court to delve into the factual analysis, by expanding the scope of the order passed in the writ petition.
2 Liberty is granted to the applicant to challenge the order dated June 30, 2026, in accordance with law. All points are kept open. Accordingly, the contempt application is disposed of and the contempt proceedings are dropped. The Rule is discharged.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)