Calcutta High Court
MAT/635/2026 of DBS BANK INDIA LIMITED Vs SUNIL KANORIA on 9 July 2026
Court No. 12 Item No. 6 Cp M.A.T. 635 of 2026 IA No : CAN 2 of 2026 DBS Bank India Limited -Versus- Sunil Kanoria Mr. Dhruv Dewan Mr. Deepanjan Dutta Roy Mr. Udbhav Nanda Ms. Sanjana Jha Ms. Niranjana Paradian Ms. Aditi Rathore …..for the appellant. Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Sr. Adv., Mr.
09.07.2026
Court No. 12
Item No. 6
Cp
M.A.T. 635 of 2026
IA No : CAN 2 of 2026
DBS Bank India Limited
-Versus-
Sunil Kanoria
Mr. Dhruv Dewan
Mr. Deepanjan Dutta Roy
Mr. Udbhav Nanda
Ms. Sanjana Jha
Ms. Niranjana Paradian
Ms. Aditi Rathore
…..for the appellant.
Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Sr. Adv.,
Mr. Deepan Kumar Sarkar,
Mr. Soumalya Ganguli,
Mr. Naman Chaudhury,
Mr. Shubrojyoti Mookherjee,
Mr. Samriddha Sen,
Mr. Deep Basak
….for the respondent.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The appeal is disposed of without any interference with the judgment and order impugned dated February 10, 2026, passed in WPA 18632 of 2025.
2. It is submitted by Mr. Chowdhury, learned senior advocate for the respondent that, a reply to the show cause notice has already been filed.
3. Mr. Dewan, learned advocate for the appellant denies such contention and submits that, the respondent has not filed a reply to the show cause notice, but has asked for additional documents.
2
4. We find that, in an earlier round of litigation, similar show cause notices issued by other banks were under challenge before a learned Judge of this court and His Lordship was of the view that, only relevant documents shall be supplied by the banks which had issued the notices to the respondent, to enable him to file a supplementary reply.
5. We pass a similar order, inter alia, directing the bank to treat the application of the respondent as a reply to the show cause notice and supply the relevant documents.
6. If the documents are voluminous, in that event the bank may call upon the respondent to take inspection thereof. Thereafter, the supplementary reply shall be filed by the respondent. The proceedings will continue in accordance with law.
7. Accordingly, the appeal and the connected application are disposed of.
8. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
(Smita Das De, J.)