Calcutta High Court
MAT/1057/2026 of FATEMA KHATUN Vs SEKH MINU AND ORS on 7 July 2026
Court No. 12 Item No. 29 Sandip IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE M.A.T. 1057 of 2026 IA No : CAN 1 of 2026 CAN 2 of 2026 Fatema Khatun -Versus- Sekh Minu & Ors. Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury, Ms. Ritoprita Ghosh, Ms. Sulagna Sarkar …..for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
07.07.2026 Court No. 12 Item No. 29 Sandip IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE M.A.T. 1057 of 2026 IA No : CAN 1 of 2026 CAN 2 of 2026 Fatema Khatun
-Versus-
Sekh Minu & Ors. Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury, Ms. Ritoprita Ghosh, Ms. Sulagna Sarkar …..for the appellant. Mr. Srijib Chakraborty, Mr. Washim Akthir Dafader
….for the respondents.
The appeal is infructuous.
The correctness of the order impugned before us is not gone into and need not be answered in this appeal. The point of law arising out of the said order is kept open.
The grievance of the appellant was that, the notice of the meeting for removal of the Sabhapati of the Zilla Parisad was not received by the appellant. The very filing of the appeal itself indicates that the appellant was aware of the meeting, and the same is scheduled to be held today.
The appellant is always at liberty to caste her vote.
Accordingly, the appeal and the connected applications are dismissed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Smita Das De, J.)