Calcutta High Court

CPAN/1680/2025 of LAKSHMAN CHANDRA MALLICK Vs MONJIT JADAV, SUB-DIV OFFICER, EGRA CUM REVENUE OFFICER AND ORS. on 3 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

03.7.2026 (Item No. 14 ) (AB) In the High Court at Calcutta Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.P.A.N. 1680 of 2025 in W.P.A. 22180 of 2023 Lakshman Chandra Mallick VS Mr. Monjit Jadav, Sub-Divisional Officer, Egra-cum-Revenue Officer, Purba Medinipur & Ors. Mr. Binoy Kumar Das

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Court No. 38 03.7.2026

(Item No. 14 )

(AB)

In the High Court at Calcutta Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side

C.P.A.N. 1680 of 2025 in W.P.A. 22180 of 2023

Lakshman Chandra Mallick VS Mr. Monjit Jadav, Sub-Divisional Officer, Egra-cum-Revenue Officer, Purba Medinipur & Ors.

Mr. Binoy Kumar Das

…. For the petitioner

Mr. Tapas Kumar Chatterjee

Mr. Bhagbat Chaudhuri

…. For the contemnor Nos. 1 & 2

This is a contempt proceeding arising from an order dated November 19, 2024. Mr. Binoy Kumar Das, learned advocate appears for the petitioner. Mr. Tapas Kumar Chatterjee, learned advocate with Mr. Bhagbat Chowdhuri, learned advocate appears for the contemnors. Learned advocate for the alleged contemnors has placed a reasoned order dated January 29, 2026 passed by the alleged contemnor no. 1 in compliance of the judgment of this Court dated November 19, 2024. After hearing the submissions made on behalf of the parties and on perusal of the reasoned order dated January 29, 2026, this Court holds that

2 nothing further survives in this contempt proceeding as the direction of this Court has been complied with. Learned advocate for the petitioner also submits that, the petitioner has already preferred an appeal from the said reasoned order dated January 29, 2026 before the jurisdictional appellate authority and the same is pending. It is made clear that, this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case of the petitioner. In view of the above, the contempt application being CPAN 1680 of 2025 stands dropped and closed. Accordingly, CPAN 1680 of 2025 stands disposed of.

(Aniruddha Roy, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead