Calcutta High Court
WP.ST/15/2026 of SANDHYA CHHATUI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 24 June 2026
D/L 24.06.2026 (Naba) 32 W.P.S.T. 15 of 2026 Sandhya Chhatui Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Kapil Chandra Sahoo, Ms. Tithli Piplai ...for the Petitioner Ms. Chandreyi Alam, ld. A.G.P., Ms. Runu Mukherjee ... the State 1. The learned advocate for the writ petitioner submits that he
Ct. No.4 D/L 24.06.2026
(Naba) 32
W.P.S.T. 15 of 2026
Sandhya Chhatui
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Kapil Chandra Sahoo,
Ms. Tithli Piplai
...for the Petitioner
Ms. Chandreyi Alam, ld. A.G.P.,
Ms. Runu Mukherjee
...the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned advocate for the writ petitioner submits that he would approach the Writ Court dealing with the determination of service matters. The prayer is made since the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal (‘Tribunal’ for short) is non-functional. Despite the Tribunal being non- functional, the petitioner filed an Original Application bearing O.A. No. 706 of 2025 before the Tribunal.
2. The learned advocate for the writ petitioner also submits that since Tribunal is non-functional, the petitioner cannot even pray for withdrawal of the O.A. to facilitate filing of a writ petition.
3. We, therefore, dispose of the Original Application bearing O.A. No. 706 of 2025 pending before the Tribunal.
4. In view of the above circumstances and submissions, we grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the Single Judge Bench for the self- same relief.
2
5. The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)