Calcutta High Court

CRC/10/2026 of PAMPI HALDER SANTRA Vs BAPI SANTRA on 22 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No. 12 Item 01 Cp CRC 10 of 2026 In C.O. 1475 of 2023 Pampi Halder (Santra) Vs. Bapi Santra Mr. Debashis Banerjee Mr. Rakesh Jana …..for the applicant. Mr. Shibaji Kr. Das Mr. Dipendu Sarkar …..for the contemnor. 1. Mr. Bapi Santra is present in court today in answer to the

22.06.2026

Court No. 12

Item 01

Cp

CRC 10 of 2026

In

C.O. 1475 of 2023

Pampi Halder (Santra)

Vs.

Bapi Santra

Mr. Debashis Banerjee

Mr. Rakesh Jana

…..for the applicant.

Mr. Shibaji Kr. Das

Mr. Dipendu Sarkar

…..for the contemnor.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Bapi Santra is present in court today in answer to the Rule.

2. As the Act VIII, Case No.49 of 2024 is pending before the learned District Judge, Nadia, Krishna Nagar, further direction for visitation shall be decided by the learned court. The arrangement made by this court appears to be unworkable in view of an incident which took place in the office of the learned advocate Mr. Sourav Bhattacharya.

3. It is submitted by Mr. Santra through Mr. Das, learned advocate for the alleged contemnor, that the child who is 11 years old is not comfortable in the learned advocate’s chamber and consequently the learned advocate has also been changed.

2

4. Under such circumstances, the visitation shall take place in the chamber of the learned District Judge before whom the matter is pending, on 1st and 3rd Saturdays of the month between 3 pm to 4 pm under the supervision of officials working under the learned District Judge, and this arrangement will continue till further orders are passed by the learned District Judge or the competent court, upon the parties applying for further orders of visitation. The learned District Judge will act on the basis of the communication of this order.

5. The Registry is directed to send down a copy of this order to the said District Judge.

6. Personal appearance of Mr. Santra is dispensed with.

7. Accordingly, the contempt application is disposed of and the contempt proceedings are dropped. The Rule is discharged.

8. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead