Calcutta High Court

CPAN/1652/2023 of OMKAR NANDAN GHOSH Vs KHARGRAM GRAM PANCHAYAT AND ANR on 15 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No. 12 Item No.10 Cp CPAN 1652 of 2023 In WPA 21675 of 2022 Omkar Nandan Ghosh Vs. Khargram Gram Panchayat & Anr. Mr. Lutful Haque, Ms. Taharima Khatun, Mr. Mahewash Rasool … for the Applicant. Ms. Kakali Das Chakraborty … for the Alleged Contemnor No.2. 1. It has been

15.06.2026

Court No. 12

Item No.10

Cp

CPAN 1652 of 2023

In

WPA 21675 of 2022

Omkar Nandan Ghosh

Vs.

Khargram Gram Panchayat & Anr.

Mr. Lutful Haque,

Ms. Taharima Khatun,

Mr. Mahewash Rasool

… for the Applicant.

Ms. Kakali Das Chakraborty

… for the Alleged Contemnor No.2.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. It has been pointed out by the learned advocate for the alleged contemnor that, in the order passed in the writ petition, L.R. Plot No.3758 has been wrongly recorded, although the allegation was that the unauthorized construction was on L.R. Plot No. 3578.

2. It appears that, in the writ petition L.R. Plot No.3578 has been mentioned. The decision of the panchayat authorities is also in respect of Plot No.3578, on which the alleged unauthorized construction has been detected. The mistake in the order is noted, but it is inconsequential, as in that paragraph only submissions have been recorded. The direction in the writ petition passed upon the panchayat authorities, was to consider the representation of the applicant dated July 25, 2022. In the representation, the plot No has been correctly mentioned as 3578. Thus, the authority proceeded on the basis of the correct plot No.

3. The compliance report indicates that, the unauthorized construction has been found on L.R. Plot No.3578 and the person responsible for such construction has been asked to demolish the said construction within 15 days from the date of notice dated April 19, 2024.

4. In view of the fact that unauthorized construction has been detected, nothing remains to be decided in the application. The issue of unauthorized construction which has been found by the authority should be ignored, as encroachment is a matter to be decided by the civil court. As unauthorized construction has been detected, the law should take its own course and the panchayat authorities should send all documents to the concerned Sub- Divisional Officer for proper steps under Section 23(5) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. Such documents shall be sent to the concerned Sub-Divisional Officer within two weeks from date.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer shall proceed in accordance with law, upon giving adequate opportunity of hearing to all parties.

6. Accordingly, the application is disposed of and the contempt proceedings are dropped.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead