Calcutta High Court

MAT/959/2026 of RUNA BEGUM AND ORS. Vs THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. on 11 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.12 (gc) MAT 959 of 2026 CAN 1 of 2026 CAN 2 of 2026 Runa Begum & Ors. Vs. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors. Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty, Ms. Ananya Das …for the Appellants. Mr. Alok Kumar Ghosh, Ms. Debangana Dey …for the KMC. 1. CAN 1 of 2026 is an

11.06.2026

SL No.11

Court No.12

(gc)

MAT 959 of 2026

CAN 1 of 2026

CAN 2 of 2026

Runa Begum & Ors.

Vs.

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty,

Ms. Ananya Das

…for the Appellants.

Mr. Alok Kumar Ghosh,

Ms. Debangana Dey

…for the KMC.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CAN 1 of 2026 is an application for special leave to appeal from the order dated April 9, 2026 passed by the learned Judge in a contempt application being CPAN 1372 of 2024 arising out of WPA 18925 of 2023.

2. We find from the order impugned that, Her Lordship had directed the Corporation to take follow up steps with regard to demolition of the property. We are of the view that, when the appellants have already preferred an appeal before the Municipal Building Tribunal from order passed in the demolition proceeding, the remedy of the appellant is before the Tribunal. The appellants were aware of the proceeding and of the decision of the Corporation. It is for the Municipal Building Tribunal to pass necessary orders that they deem fit and proper. We do not wish to comment on that.

3. Under such circumstances, we are of the opinion that there is no room for interference with the contempt

2 application at this stage. The appellants can proceed before the Tribunal in accordance with law.

4. Leave to prefer the appeal is, thus, not granted.

5. Accordingly, the appeal and the connected applications are disposed of.

6. All issues are left open to be decided at the appropriate stage.

7. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

8. Parties are to act on the server copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead