Calcutta High Court

WPA/28249/2024 of SANJOY PARAMANIK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 20 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Sl. No. 65 Ct No. 24 SG WPA 28249 of 2024 Sanjoy Paramanik Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Firdous Samim, Ms. Gopa Biswas, Mr. Ankita Ghosh, Ms. Salini Bhattacharya, Mr. Asik Mandal, Ms. Hena Sardar. ……for the Petitioner Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya, Mr. Bibek Dutta, Mr.

20.05.2026

Sl. No. 65

Ct No. 24

SG

WPA 28249 of 2024

Sanjoy Paramanik

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Firdous Samim,

Ms. Gopa Biswas,

Mr. Ankita Ghosh,

Ms. Salini Bhattacharya,

Mr. Asik Mandal,

Ms. Hena Sardar.

……for the Petitioner

Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya,

Mr. Bibek Dutta,

Mr. Manas Bhattacharyya.

……for WBBSE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Since there is no appearance on behalf of the School Service Commission, Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandyopadhyay, learned Advocate who usually appear for the Commission is requested to assist the Court in this matter.

2. The concerned respondent is requested to regularize the appointment of Mr. Bandyopadhyay.

3. However, there is no representation on behalf of the School Authorities.

4. The petitioner’s application for transfer on the self medical ground is pending consideration before the West Bengal Central School Service Commission.

5. The instant writ petition stands disposed of by directing the Secretary of the West Bengal Central

2 School Service Commission to take necessary steps to dispose of the application for transfer made by the petitioner in accordance with law at the earliest but by 30.06.2026.

6. If required, further health checkup of the petitioner may be conducted by the Commission, in accordance with law.

7. Suspension of the Utsashree portal will not be a ground to reject or keep in abeyance the application of the petitioner. The application of the petitioner will be considered in the offline mode.

8. The fate of the petitioner’s application shall be made known to the petitioner immediately thereafter.

9. If the application of the petitioner is allowed, then necessary consequential steps shall be taken without any further delay.

10. The writ petition stands disposed of.

11. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

12. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead