Calcutta High Court

WPA/4715/2026 of BANASHREE PATRA (NEE SHIT) Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 20 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

AD/27/24 266312 NANDY (DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/4715/2026 BANASHREE PATRA (NEE SHIT) VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Soumik Dey, Advocate Mr. Subhomoy Paul, Advocate Mr. Saikat Pal, Advocate Ms. Rika Das, Advocate Mr.

AD/27/24

266312

NANDY

(DO)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

WPA/4715/2026

BANASHREE PATRA (NEE SHIT)

VS

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

Mr. Soumik Dey, Advocate

Mr. Subhomoy Paul, Advocate

Mr. Saikat Pal, Advocate

Ms. Rika Das, Advocate

Mr. Mahadev Dey, Advocate

……for the Petitioner

Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandopadhyay, Advocate

……for the WBCSSC

Mr. Kunal Ganguly, Advocate

……for the WBBSE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Let affidavit of service, as filed, be kept with the record.

2. In spite of service, none appears on behalf of the school authorities.

3. The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher in respondent no. 7, had made an application for transfer on the ground of the medical condition of her child.

4. However, as it appears from the records, the application is not in the prescribed format and has been made merely by way of a representation in the offline mode.

5. The petitioner is granted liberty to file an application in the prescribed format before the school authorities within 20.06.2026.

6. The School will take appropriate steps in the matter to consider and forward such application if the petitioner is otherwise eligible.

7. Since the ‘Utsashree Portal’ temporarily suspended, the application will be made in the offline mode and will be considered as such by the school authority.

8. With the afore-stated direction, the writ-petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

P a g e | 2

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead