Calcutta High Court

WPA/10135/2026 of SUSHAMA MAITY MANNA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 20 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

43 sdas WPA 10135 of 2026 Sushama Maity Manna Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sakti Pada Jana Mr. Subhajyoti Das …. for the petitioner 1. Let affidavit- of -service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. In spite of service, none appears on behalf of the school

20.05.2026

sdas

WPA 10135 of 2026

Sushama Maity Manna

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Sakti Pada Jana

Mr. Subhajyoti Das

…. for the petitioner

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record.

2. In spite of service, none appears on behalf of the school authorities.

3. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in a High School. Petitioner‟s application for general transfer on the ground of distance has been pending before the school authorities since October 25, 2025.

4. The school authorities are directed to dispose of the said application, without taking the ground that the petitioner is a single teacher in her subject as the same has already been decided by the Hon‟ble Court in Gokul Chandra Mallick vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. in MAT 1218 of 2024 and Rupak Dhua vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. In FMA 995 of 2025.

5. In view of the aforestated, responded no. 4 is directed to dispose of the application of the petitioner by June 30, 2026. In the event such application is allowed, the school authorities will immediately forward the same along with requisite “No Objection Certificate” and declaration to the respondent no. 3 within a period of two weeks from allowing the application.

6. The concerned authorities will take all consequential steps in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

7. The suspension of „Utsashree Portal‟ will not be an impediment for the concerned authority to consider the application for transfer of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode.

8. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is, thus, disposed of.

9. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead