Calcutta High Court
FMA/242/2025 of SIKHA PARAMANICK Vs CHAITALI PARAMANICK NEE DASGUPTA AND ORS on 18 May 2026
2026. MNS. FMA No. 242 of 2025 + CAN 1 of 2024 Sikha Paramanick Vs. Chaitali Paramanick (nee Dasgupta) and another Mr. Kaushik Roy, Adv. … for the appellant. Mr. Amartya Basu, Ms. Amrita Poddar, Advs. …for the respondents. 1. The present appeal has been preferred against an order
D/L.12.
May 18, 2026.
MNS.
FMA No. 242 of 2025
+
CAN 1 of 2024
Sikha Paramanick
Vs.
Chaitali Paramanick (nee Dasgupta)
and another
Mr. Kaushik Roy, Adv.
… for the appellant.
Mr. Amartya Basu,
Ms. Amrita Poddar, Advs.
…for the respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present appeal has been preferred against an order whereby the custody application of the appellant was dismissed on the ground that the child has attained majority on October 28, 2024.
2. We do not find any illegality in the impugned order.
3. As such, FMA No. 242 of 2025 is dismissed under Order XLI, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
4. CAN 1 of 2024 is disposed of accordingly.
5. There will be no order as to costs.
(Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.) (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)