Calcutta High Court
FMAT/100/2026 of MUDASWAR MALLIK REPD BY HIS FATHER SERAJUL MALLIK Vs JAMIRUDDIN MALLIK on 18 May 2026
21 Ct No.16 18.05.2026 (SSS) FMAT 100 of 2026 with CAN 1 of 2026 Mudaswar Mallik represented by his father Serajul Mallik Vs. Jamiruddin Mallik Mr. Mukteswar Maity, Ms. Manika Sarkar …..For the appellant. 1. The present appeal has been preferred against an order passed in a
AD – 21
Ct No.16
18.05.2026
(SSS)
FMAT 100 of 2026
with
CAN 1 of 2026
Mudaswar Mallik represented by his father Serajul Mallik
Vs.
Jamiruddin Mallik
Mr. Mukteswar Maity,
Ms. Manika Sarkar
…..For the appellant.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present appeal has been preferred against an order passed in a miscellaneous appeal, refusing to grant ad-interim injunction.
2. Since no second appeal is maintainable under Order XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, FMAT 100 of 2026 is dismissed as not maintainable.
3. CAN 1 of 2026 is consequentially disposed of as well.
4. There will be no order as to costs.
5. It is made clear that nothing in the above order shall prevent the appellant from taking appropriate recourse of law by filing a properly constituted challenge against the impugned order.
6. Liberty is granted to the learned advocate-on- record for the appellant to take back the certified copies of the impugned orders upon furnishing photocopies thereof for the records. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.) 2