Calcutta High Court

WPA/7279/2026 of RUPAM MAHAJAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 13 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026 Ct. No. 24 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE. WPA 7279 of 2026 Rupam Mahajan Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Ms. Pritha Biswas, Ms. Upasana Sarkar. … for the petitioner. Mr. Sourav Mitra,

13.05.

Ct. No. 24

Ab

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE.

WPA 7279 of 2026

Rupam Mahajan

Vs.

The State of West Bengal and others.

---------------

Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury,

Ms. Pritha Biswas,

Ms. Upasana Sarkar.

… for the petitioner.

Mr. Sourav Mitra,

Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy.

… for the WBCSSC.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record.

2. In spite of service, the School Authority is not represented.

3. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher.

4. The petitioner had applied for general transfer on the distance ground.

5. Such application has been pending since February 2026. The school has not taken any decision in the matter.

6. Respondent no. 6, Head of the Institution, is directed to dispose of the application of the petitioner by June 30, 2026 in accordance with law and also in line with the decision in Gokul Chandra Mallick vs. State of West Bengal & Ors, in MAT

1218 of 2024 and Rupak Dhua vs. State of West Bengal & Ors., in FMA 995 of 2025 passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court.

7. If found eligible, the case of the petitioner shall be forwarded to the concerned District Inspector of Schools (SE) by the school authorities along with the application and the requisite No Objection Certificate, by July 15, 2026.

8. Temporary suspension of ‘Utsashree Portal’ will not be an impediment for the concerned authority to consider the application for transfer of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode.

9. With these aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

10. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

11. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead