Calcutta High Court

WPA/9064/2026 of SAJAL NAYAK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 13 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WPA 9064 of 2026 Sajal Nayak Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. P.K. Panja Mr. Sayan Dev Kumar … … for petitioner Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandyopadhyay … … for the WBCSSC 1. Affidavit of service as filed in Court be kept on record. 2. In spite of service,

ss

13.05.2026

WPA 9064 of 2026

Sajal Nayak

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. P.K. Panja

Mr. Sayan Dev Kumar

… … for petitioner

Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandyopadhyay

… … for the WBCSSC

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of service as filed in Court be kept on record.

2. In spite of service, none appears on behalf of the school authorities.

3. The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, has been serving in the school since 2009 and had applied for transfer on the general ground of distance.

4. The said application has been rejected by the school on the ground that the petitioner is beyond 10 per cent ratio of the teachers who are seeking transfer.

5. The petitioner seeks liberty to file fresh application in the Offline mode since the ‘Utsashree Portal’ is temporarily suspended.

6. As held by this Hon’ble Court in MAT 1706 of 2024 (Mithun Roy Vs. State of West Bengal & Others) that suspension of a portal cannot negate the right of a person as enshrined in a Statute.

7. The same cannot be curtailed merely because the facilitating procedure of the Offline portal is presently unavailable.

8. In view thereof, the petitioner is directed to file fresh application for transfer in the prescribed format with the school authority in the Offline mode.

9. The school authorities are directed to consider the application in the Offline mode, which may be made by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible.

10. With these aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

11. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

12. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead