Calcutta High Court
WPA/7217/2026 of SURAJIT DE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 13 May 2026
2026 Ct. No. 24 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE. WPA 7217 of 2026 Surajit De Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Ms. Pritha Biswas, Ms. Upasana Sarkar. … for the petitioner. Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy.
13.05.
Ct. No. 24
Ab
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE.
WPA 7217 of 2026
Surajit De
Vs.
The State of West Bengal and others.
---------------
Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury,
Ms. Pritha Biswas,
Ms. Upasana Sarkar.
… for the petitioner.
Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy.
… for the SSC.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record.
2. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher. The petitioner had made an application for transfer sometime in 2022, which was duly forwarded by the School Authorities by issuing a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to the respondent no. 5. The respondent no. 5 in its turn has forwarded the same to the respondent no. 4 sometime in the year 2022. The same is pending consideration before the Commission.
3. Learned Advocate appearing for the respondent no. 4, submits that the pendency is on account of suspension of the Utsashree portal.
4. The respondent no. 4 is directed to consider the application in accordance with law and dispose of the same by July 15, 2026 and communicate the result of such consideration to the petitioner as well as to the school authorities by the afore-stated date. If the application is allowed, the petitioner will be permitted to join the opted school, provided the same has been notified in any other selection process.
5. With these afore-stated directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
6. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)