Calcutta High Court

WPA/8776/2026 of SUMITA SEN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 13 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WPA 8776 of 2026 Sumita Sen Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury Ms. Prityha Biswas Ms. Upasana Sarkar … … for petitioner Mr. Sunit Kr. Ray … … for the SSC 1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record. 2. In spite of

ss

13.05.2026

WPA 8776 of 2026

Sumita Sen

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury

Ms. Prityha Biswas

Ms. Upasana Sarkar

… … for petitioner

Mr. Sunit Kr. Ray

… … for the SSC

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record.

2. In spite of service, the school authority is not represented.

3. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher.

4. The petitioner made an application for transfer on own seeking on the ground of distance.

5. The said application was rejected in 2022.

6. The rejection of an earlier application by the respondent No. 5 on the ground of single teacher issue, cannot be sustained as this Hon’ble Court has held in Gokul Chandra Mallick vs. State of West Bengal & Ors, in MAT 1218 of 2024 and Rupak Dhua vs. State of West Bengal & Ors., in FMA 995 of 2025 that the single teacher issue or dealing teacher issue is contrary to a Notification of January 3, 2022.

7. The decision taken by the District Inspector of Schools is not in accordance with the dictum of this Hon’ble Court. However, decision of the D.I.

cannot be faulted as the dictum of this Hon’ble Court came subsequent to the decision taken by the D.I. However, the said decision cannot be sustained at present.

8. However, since a long period of time has lapsed and the surrounding facts and circumstances may have changed, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to file a fresh application for transfer on the selfsame ground with the school authorities by June 30, 2026, who shall immediately issue a No Objection Certificate and forward the same to the District Inspector of Schools by July 15, 2026.

9. The respondent No. 5, D.I. (S.E.) will deal with such application strictly and in line with the decisions in Gokul Chandra Mallick (supra) and Rupak Dhua (supra) and take all consequential steps in accordance with law and irrespective of the fact whether local arrangement can be done or not.

10. Temporary suspension of ‘Utsashree Portal’ will not be an impediment for the concerned authority to consider the application for transfer of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode.

11. With these aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

12. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

13. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead