Calcutta High Court
WPA/7286/2026 of DEBRANI BASAK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 13 May 2026
2026 Ct. No. 24 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE. WPA 7286 of 2026 Debrani Basak Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Ms. Pritha Biswas, Ms. Upasana Sarkar. … for the petitioner. Mr. Kanak Kiran
13.05.
Ct. No. 24
Ab
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE.
WPA 7286 of 2026
Debrani Basak
Vs.
The State of West Bengal and others.
---------------
Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury,
Ms. Pritha Biswas,
Ms. Upasana Sarkar.
… for the petitioner.
Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandyopadhyay.
… for the WBCSSC.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record.
2. In spite of service, the School Authority is not represented.
3. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher.
4. The petitioner has made an application for transfer on own seeking on the ground of distance.
5. The said application was rejected in 2021.
6. The rejection of an earlier application by the respondent no. 6 on the ground of single teacher issue, cannot be considered in this application as this Hon’ble Court has held in Gokul Chandra Mallick vs. State of West Bengal & Ors, in MAT 1218 of 2024 and Rupak Dhua vs. State of West Bengal & Ors., in FMA 995 of 2025 that the single teacher issue or dealing teacher issue is contrary to a Notification of January 3, 2022.
7. The decision taken by the District Inspector of School is not in accordance with the dictum of this Hon.ble Court. The decision of the School cannot be faulted as the Hon’ble High Court’s decisions were subsequent. The decision of the School cannot however be sustained at present.
8. However, since a long period of time has lapsed and the surrounding facts and circumstances may have changed, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to file a fresh application for transfer on the selfsame ground with the school authorities by June 30, 2026, who shall immediate issue a No Objection Certificate and forward the same to the District Inspector of Schools by July 15, 2026.
9. The respondent no. 5, the District Inspector of Schools (SE), will deal with such application strictly and in line with the decisions in Gokul Chandra Mallick (supra) and Rupak Dhua (supra) and take all consequential steps in accordance with law and irrespective of the fact whether local arrangement can be done or not.
10. Temporary suspension of ‘Utsashree Portal’ will not be an impediment for the concerned authority to consider the application for transfer of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode.
11. With these aforesaid directions, the writ petition is
disposed of.
12. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
13. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)