Calcutta High Court

FMA/1752/2025 of KEKA GHOSH AND ANR Vs SUROJIT GHOSH AND ORS on 12 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.12 (gc) FMA 1752 of 2025 CAN 1 of 2026 In WPA 17208 of 2025 Keka Ghosh & Anr. Vs. Surojit Ghosh & Ors. Mr. Apurba Kumar Ghosh …for the Appellants. Mr. Sumit Roy …for the WBSEDCL. 1. Affidavit of Service is taken on record. None appears for the writ petitioner. 2. We

12.05.2026

SL No.8

Court No.12

(gc)

FMA 1752 of 2025

CAN 1 of 2026

In

WPA 17208 of 2025

Keka Ghosh & Anr.

Vs.

Surojit Ghosh & Ors.

Mr. Apurba Kumar Ghosh

…for the Appellants.

Mr. Sumit Roy

…for the WBSEDCL.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of Service is taken on record. None appears for the writ petitioner.

2. We do not find any reason to interfere with the order of His Lordship. Admittedly, the writ petitioner, in whose favour connection was directed to be provided, is the co-owner of the premises in question. Pendency of the civil suit cannot be a reason for depriving the writ petitioner from enjoying electricity, which is an essential commodity.

3. His Lordship had specifically recorded that the connection to be granted by the distribution company will abide by any order or future direction of the competent Civil Court.

4. It is well-settled that, a person in occupation of the premises shall be entitled to electricity, irrespective of the nature of occupation.

2

5. Accordingly, the appeal and the connected application are disposed of without any interference.

6. It is made clear that, the connection so supplied to the writ petitioner shall not create any equity and the civil suit will be decided on its own merits, irrespective of the fact that this Court had allowed the application for supply of electricity in favour of the writ petitioner.

7. There shall be no order as to costs.

8. Parties are to act on the server copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead