Calcutta High Court

WPA/4798/2026 of RABI SARKAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 8 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2 sdas WPA 4798 of 2026 Rabi Sarkar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Ujjal Ray Mr. Abdur Rahim …. for the petitioner Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya Mr. Bibek Dutta …. for the WBBSE 1. Let affidavit- of -service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. The petitioner, an

13.05.2026

sdas

WPA 4798 of 2026

Rabi Sarkar

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Ujjal Ray

Mr. Abdur Rahim

…. for the petitioner

Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya

Mr. Bibek Dutta

…. for the WBBSE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record.

2. The petitioner, an Assistant Headmaster in the respondent school, was subjected to several proceedings, including a disciplinary proceeding undertaken by the Board, on the complaint made by the mother of a former student, who is about 19 years of age. The student, however, seems to have made several statements that she had fled her residential house not for the company of the petitioner but due to the fact that she was not being allowed to pursue her dream of becoming a painter.

3. Ms. Bhattacharyya, learned Advocate appearing for the Board, submits, on instruction, that the disciplinary proceeding against the petitioner has been dropped and will not be pursued any further. In view of the aforestated stand taken by the Board, nothing remains to be adjudicated against the petitioner in the disciplinary proceeding.

4. Since the very basis of the order of suspension dated June 19, 2025, the disciplinary proceeding, has now been dropped, it is only proper that the said order of suspension against the petitioner be set aside. The order dated June 19, 2025 is accordingly set aside.

5. Petitioner will be permitted to undertake his service in the said school and in the same post as he was serving prior to his suspension.

6. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is, thus, disposed of.

7. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead