Calcutta High Court
WPA/9772/2026 of UTPAL MALIK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 8 May 2026
AD/495/24 266312 NANDY (DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/9772/2026 UTPAL MALIK Vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Advocate Ms. Pritha Biswas, Advocate Ms. Upasana Sarkar, Advocate …...for the Petitioner
AD/495/24
266312
NANDY
(DO)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPA/9772/2026
UTPAL MALIK
Vs.
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Advocate
Ms. Pritha Biswas, Advocate
Ms. Upasana Sarkar, Advocate
…...for the Petitioner
Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy, Advocate
……for the WBCSSC
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service, as filed, be kept with the record.
2. In spite of service, the school is not represented.
3. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher. The petitioner has applied for a transfer from the School, for which the School had duly issued 'No Objection Certificate'.
4. The transfer was sought on the spouse medical ground of the petitioner. The spouse of the petitioner has also gone through the two-tier medical examination, first by the School and then by the District Inspector of Schools.
5. The respondent no.
had thereafter forward the recommendation to the respondent no. 4 sometime in 2022.
6. It appears from the record that the respondent no. 4 has not disposed of such application which is pending since 2022.
7. The respondent no. 4, Secretary, West Bengal Central School Service Commission or the appropriate authority is directed to consider the case of the petitioner and dispose of the same by July 15, 2026. The Commission will recommend the transfer of the petitioner to a school of his choice, provided such school is not notified for any other competitive examinations.
8. With these aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)
P a g e | 2