Calcutta High Court
WPA/9496/2026 of BIPUL SARKAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 8 May 2026
AD/07/24 266312 NANDY (CORRECTION) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/9496/2026 BIPUL SARKAR VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Advocate Ms. Pritha Biswas, Advocate Ms. Upasana Sarkar, Advocate ……for
AD/07/24
266312
NANDY
(CORRECTION)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPA/9496/2026
BIPUL SARKAR
VS
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Advocate
Ms. Pritha Biswas, Advocate
Ms. Upasana Sarkar, Advocate
……for the Petitioner
Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy, Advocate
……for the SSC
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This matter has come up in the list at the instance of the petitioner for correction of an order dated 08.05.2026 wherein at paragraph 4, in the first line the word ‘self’ should be inserted in place of ‘spouse’ and in the second line of the same paragraph the set of words ‘spouse of the’ should be deleted.
2. Office is directed to correct such mistake as pointed out at the relevant portion of the order dated 08.05.2026 without any other alteration.
3. This order may be read conjointly with the order dated 08.05.2026.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)
P a g e | 2