Calcutta High Court
WPA/9394/2026 of SATYABRATA PRADHAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 8 May 2026
AD/462/24 266312 NANDY (DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/9394/2026 Satyabrata Pradhan Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Debraj Bhattacharya, Advocate Mr. Subhrajyoti Bhowmick, Advocate …... for the Petitioner 1. Affidavit of
AD/462/24
266312
NANDY
(DO)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPA/9394/2026
Satyabrata Pradhan
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Debraj Bhattacharya, Advocate
Mr. Subhrajyoti Bhowmick, Advocate
…... for the Petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service as filed be kept with the record.
2. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in respondent no. 6. The petitioner had applied for a transfer in online mode sometime in the year 2022, which was duly forwarded by the District Inspector of Schools in December 2022, to the Commission. The application is pending before the Commission.
3. The Commission, respondent no. 4 herein, and/or any person authorized by it, is directed to dispose of the application of the petitioner by July 15, 2026.
4. The Commission will consider the application regarding the opted schools, provided said schools are not notified for some other recruitment process.
5. The order of transfer, if the petitioner is found eligible, will be communicated to him by the afore-stated date.
6. Since none appears on behalf of the Commission, Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy, learned Advocate, who is present in Court, is requested to take up this matter on behalf of the Commission.
7. Let his appointment be regularized by the concerned respondent.
8. With the observations as afore-stated, the writ-petition is disposed of without any order as to costs.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)
P a g e | 2