Calcutta High Court
WPA/5989/2026 of TULIKA DHARA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 7 May 2026
Sl. No.219 Ct No. 24 SG WPA 5989 of 2026 Tulika Dhara Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Ms. Pritha Biswas, Ms. Upasana Sarkar. …for the petitioner Mr. Sunit Kr. Roy, Ms. Susmita Mondal. …for SSC Mr. Saswati Chatterjee. …for WBBSE 1. The
07.05.2026
Sl. No.219
Ct No. 24
SG
WPA 5989 of 2026
Tulika Dhara
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury,
Ms. Pritha Biswas,
Ms. Upasana Sarkar.
…for the petitioner
Mr. Sunit Kr. Roy,
Ms. Susmita Mondal.
…for SSC
Mr. Saswati Chatterjee.
…for WBBSE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record.
2. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in Geography (Pass) in a High School since 2009. The petitioner had made an application for transfer sometime in 2022, which was duly forwarded by the School Authorities by issuing a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to the respondent no. 5. The respondent no. 5 in its turn has forwarded the same to the respondent no. 4 sometime in the year 2022. The same is pending consideration before the Commission.
3. Learned Advocate appearing for the respondent no. 4, submits that the pendency is on account of suspension of the Utsashree portal.
2
4. The suspension of “Utsashree Portal” shall not be an impediment for the commission to consider the application for transfer of the petitioner.
5. The respondent no. 4, the Secretary, WBCSSC is directed to consider the application in accordance with law and dispose of the same by July 15, 2026 and communicate the result of such consideration to the petitioner as well as to the school authorities by the aforestated date. The commission will recommend the name of the petitioner to a school of her choice, provided the opted seats have not been notified for some other recruitment process.
6. With these afore-stated directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
7. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)