Calcutta High Court
WPA/21459/2025 of SWARNENDU BANERJEE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 7 May 2026
Sl. No. 85 Ct No. 24 SG WPA 21459 of 2025 Swarnendu Banerjee Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Ujjal Ray, Mr. Abdur Rahim. …for the petitioner Mr. Avishek Prasad, Ms. Richa Pramanik. …for respondent nos. 7, 8 & 9 1. The petitioner is aggrieved that certain part of
07.05.2026
Sl. No. 85
Ct No. 24
SG
WPA 21459 of 2025
Swarnendu Banerjee
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Ujjal Ray,
Mr. Abdur Rahim.
…for the petitioner
Mr. Avishek Prasad,
Ms. Richa Pramanik.
…for respondent nos. 7, 8 & 9
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner is aggrieved that certain part of his salary has been wrongfully deducted on the ground of unlawful absence from work.
2. Mr. Ray appearing for the petitioner has placed several documents to establish that the dates on which the petitioner was absent could not have been construed as illegal or unlawful leave under any circumstances.
3. Mr. Prasad appearing for the school authority is willing to refund the payment which was deducted, not due to any mala fides, but on account of erroneous entries which had been made in the service book.
4. In view of the aforestated stand taken by the school, let the school issue the refund payment of Rs.5,238/- along with a consolidated sum of Rs.2,500/- on account of interest by June 30, 2026. The petitioner will render all cooperation to the school
2 authorities to avail the refund and the interest thereon and to enable the school authority to rectify and correct the erroneous entries made in the service book.
5. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
6. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)