Calcutta High Court

WPA/21399/2022 of MANICK BERA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 7 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

55 sdas WPA 21399 of 2022 Manick Bera Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Ujjal Ray …. for the petitioner Mr. Sourav Mitra …. for the CSSC 1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record. 2. In spite of service, the school authority is not represented. 3. The

07.05.2026

sdas

WPA 21399 of 2022

Manick Bera

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Ujjal Ray

…. for the petitioner

Mr. Sourav Mitra

…. for the CSSC

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record.

2. In spite of service, the school authority is not represented.

3. The petitioner’s application for transfer on the medial ground of his child had been rejected by the school authority in 2022.

4. Though the medical ground (Autism Spectrum Disorder), is not a ground specified under Rule 4(a) of the Notification of September 8, 2021, this Hon’ble Court, vide several decisions, has considered the Rule and has held that such a disability/medical condition may qualify an incumbent to obtain the transfer. However, since a long period of time has lapsed and the attending circumstances may have changed, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a fresh application for transfer with the school authority, who shall consider the same in the light of

WPA 15447 of 2025 (Beauti Bitha vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.), WPA 20742 of 2023 (Saurav Basu vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors., WPA 9141 of 2025 (Swati Pal vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. and WPA 26829 of 2024 (Sunita Nandan vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.).

5. If found otherwise eligible, the school authority will take steps to issue declaration and the requisite No Objection Certificate and forward the same to the concerned D.I. within a period of six weeks from the date of making the application by the petitioner.

6. With these aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

7. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead