Calcutta High Court

WPA/8879/2024 of CHAMPA BHAR Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

33 Court No. 24 Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 8879 of 2024 In the matter of : CHAMPA BHAR … Petitioner VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. … Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudip Ghosh

06.05.2026

Item no.DL 33

Court No. 24

Asraf, A.R.(Ct.)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Case No.

WPA 8879 of 2024

In the matter of :

CHAMPA BHAR

… Petitioner

VS.

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

… Respondents

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury

Ms. Pritha Biswas

Ms. Upasana Sarkar

… Advocates

For the Respondent / SSC :

Mr. Sunit Kr. Roy

… Advocate

For the Respondent / WBBSE :

Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya

Mr. Bibek Dutta

… Advocates

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of service, as filed, be kept on record.

2. In spite of service, there is no representation on behalf of the State or the school authorities.

3. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in Pachim Surendranagar Adarsha Banipith, South

Parganas since 2013. The petitioner has applied for a transfer from the school, for which the school had duly issued “No Objection Certificate”.

4. The transfer was sought on self medical ground of the petitioner. The petitioner has also gone through the two-tier medical examination, first by the school and then by the concerned District Inspector of Schools.

5. The respondent no.4 had thereafter forwarded her recommendation to the respondent no.3 sometime in 2022.

6. It appears from the record that the respondent no.3 has not disposed of such application which is pending since 2022.

7. The respondent no.3 or the concerned authority of the Commission is directed to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner by June 15, 2026, if the opted schools have not been notified for some other recruitment process.

8. In case, the opted schools are not available, concerned Commission shall provide options of available schools to the petitioner near to her preferred schools.

9. Temporary suspension of online “Utsashree Portal” shall not be a ground for non- consideration of transfer application of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode.

10. With the aforestated directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

11. There shall be no order as to costs.

12. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

( Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J. )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead