Calcutta High Court

WPA/3491/2024 of SUJIT PURKAIT Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

20 sdas WPA 3491 of 2024 Sujit Purkait Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Shuvro Prokash Lahiri …. For the petitioner Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharya Mr. Bibek Dutta …. for the WBBSE 1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record. 2. In spite of service, the School

06.05.2026

sdas

WPA 3491 of 2024

Sujit Purkait

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Shuvro Prokash Lahiri

…. For the petitioner

Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharya

Mr. Bibek Dutta

…. for the WBBSE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record.

2. In spite of service, the School Authority is not represented.

3. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in the Baikunthapur Harinarayanpur F.C. Memorial. His application for transfer, though not rejected, has been kept in abeyance by the concerned District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), on the ground that the requisite No Objection Certificate from the school authorities has not been issued. A copy of such communication vide Memorandum No. 575/S dated March 24, 2025, as handed over by the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, is kept on record. Alongwith this communication, the school authorities have submitted the requisite documents including No Objection Certificate and other documents pertaining to the petitioner, as will appear from their communication dated April 11, 2025, a copy whereof is kept on record.

4. As it now appears, the hurdle to consider the application of the petitioner for transfer seems to have been overcome.

5. In view of the aforestated, the petitioner’s offline application since the Utsashree Portal is currently under temporary suspension will be considered by the respondent no. 5 within a period of six weeks from the date of the communication of this order by the petitioner to the concerned D.I.

6. Temporary suspension of ‘Utsashree Portal’ will not be an impediment for the concerned authority to consider the application for transfer of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode.

7. With these aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

8. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead