Calcutta High Court

WPCRC/60/2026 of KANCHAN MONADAL AND ANR Vs RITA NASKAR on 4 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.12 (gc) WPCRC 60 of 2026 In WPA 18542 of 2021 Kanchan Mondal & Anr. Vs. Rita Naskar Mr. Md. Zeeshanuz Zaman …for the Applicants/Petitioners. Mr. Sujoy Bandyopadhyay, Mrs. Puja Naskar ….for the alleged Contemnor. 1. The Pradhan, Smt. Rita Naskar is present in Court in

04.05.2026

M/L No.1

Court No.12

(gc)

WPCRC 60 of 2026

In

WPA 18542 of 2021

Kanchan Mondal & Anr.

Vs.

Rita Naskar

Mr. Md. Zeeshanuz Zaman

…for the Applicants/Petitioners.

Mr. Sujoy Bandyopadhyay,

Mrs. Puja Naskar

….for the alleged Contemnor.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Pradhan, Smt. Rita Naskar is present in Court in answer to the Rule. She tendered unconditional apology.

2. It is submitted that steps were taken by the concerned Gram Panchayat and the construction was found to be unauthorized. It further appears from a document produced by the alleged contemnor that part of the building was demolished by the PWD and the person responsible for such unauthorized construction was also asked to self-demolish. Moreover, it is submitted that the documents have been sent to the concerned Sub-Divisional Officer for necessary steps under Section 23(5) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1963. The documents which have been filed in Court today and which are available with the concerned Gram Panchayat shall

2 be served upon Mr. Md. Hasanuz Zaman, in course of this week.

3. Accordingly, the contempt application is disposed of.

4. It is needless to mention that the applicants will be at liberty to take such steps that are permissible in law.

5. It is also expected that the Sub-Divisional Officer will take necessary steps in this regard.

6. Rule stands discharged.

7. Contempt proceeding is dropped.

8. Parties are to act on the server copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead