Calcutta High Court

WPA/18481/2025 of MONI BEGAM AND ANR. Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 20 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

sb Ct.3. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 18481 of 2025 Mst. Moni Begam & Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sunny Nandy Mr. Akash Dutta Mr. Manish Biswas Mr. Ranjan Roy … For the petitioners. Mr. Asish Kumar

M/L 4

20.04.2026

sb

Ct.3.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

WPA 18481 of 2025

Mst. Moni Begam & Anr.

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Sunny Nandy

Mr. Akash Dutta

Mr. Manish Biswas

Mr. Ranjan Roy

… For the petitioners.

Mr. Asish Kumar Guha

Mr. Rajendra Chaturvedi

… For the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on record.

2. Despite service, the municipality and the private respondent are not represented.

3. The petitioners are aggrieved by the failure on the part of the municipality to take steps on the basis of the petitioners’ representation dated 21st April, 2025, so as to instruct one of the flat owners, who is residing on the 3rd floor to repair the sewerage line so that the petitioners’ life and property is protected.

4. Learned advocate representing the petitioners by drawing attention of this Court to the photographs annexed to the writ petition would submit that the ceiling of the petitioners’ especially the wash room and the bed room, have been affected. According to him, the sewerage water is seeping through the ceiling which is affecting the life and property of the petitioners. He submits in terms of the provisions of Section 349 of the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993, a duty is cast on the municipal authorities to ensure that the sewerage lines in a building or a locality or a land is maintained appropriately. According to him, notwithstanding receipt of the representation, the municipality has failed to act, hence the writ petition.

5. Having heard the learned advocates representing the petitioners and the State and noting that the aforesaid leakage of water may cause serious health hazard, I am of the view that the municipality should take immediate steps in the matter and decide on the petitioners’ representation by carrying out an inspection of the premises in question and if the municipality on inspection finds that the sewerage water is seeping through the petitioners’ ceiling, appropriate remedial measure should be proposed and enforced by the municipality at the earliest.

6. The entire process in this regard must be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order.

7. The petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the non-appearing respondents.

8. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for be given to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead