Calcutta High Court
RVW/43/2026 of KAVITA JAISWAL Vs SOURAV JAISWAL on 10 April 2026
Court No.12 (gc) RVW 43 of 2026 CAN 1 of 2026 CAN 2 of 2026 In CO 2143 of 2025 Kavita Jaiswal Vs. Sourav Jaiswal Mr. Goutam Misra, Mr. Subas Ray, Mr. Vaskar Pal …for the Applicant. Mr. Soumik Dey, Mr. Subhomoy Paul, Ms. Tania Ghosh, Mr. Saikat Pal, Ms. Rika Das, Mr. Mahadev Dey
10.04.2026
SL No.15
Court No.12
(gc)
RVW 43 of 2026
CAN 1 of 2026
CAN 2 of 2026
In
CO 2143 of 2025
Kavita Jaiswal
Vs.
Sourav Jaiswal
Mr. Goutam Misra,
Mr. Subas Ray,
Mr. Vaskar Pal
…for the Applicant.
Mr. Soumik Dey,
Mr. Subhomoy Paul,
Ms. Tania Ghosh,
Mr. Saikat Pal,
Ms. Rika Das,
Mr. Mahadev Dey
…for the Opposite Party/Respondent.
Re: CAN 2 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is an application for condonation for delay. There is a delay of 45 days in preferring the instant review application.
2. Considering the averments made in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the application, this Court is satisfied with the explanation offered for not being able to prefer the memorandum of review within the period of limitation.
3. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is allowed.
4. Review application is regularized.
2
Re: RVW 43 of 2026 With CAN 1 of 2026
5. The review application is allowed.
6. It appears from the e-court services portal that both the suits, namely, the Matrimonial Suit No.1172 of 2022 and Matrimonial Suit No.444 of 2024 are fairly at the advanced stage and are pending before the same Court. Thus, the order dated November 24, 2025 applies to both the suits and the learned Trial Judge is requested to decide both the suits together and analogously on the basis of the evidence and the documents already on record.
7. Accordingly, the review application is disposed of.
8. In view of disposal of the review application, the connected application is also disposed of.
9. Affidavit of service is taken on record.
10. There shall be no order as to costs.
11. Parties are to act on the server copy of this order.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)