Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs SUN INFO TECH ASIA on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Before SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi TA No.35O OF 2023

PUNJAB NATIONAT BANK VS ]'US SUN INFO TECH

ASIA & ORS

Reserued on

z L4.O7.2O26

Pronounced on : 24.08.2026

Punjab National Bank

Vs.

1. M/s Sun Info Tech Asia

2. Sh. Atul Mittal

-Applicant bank

- Defendants

Present

Shri. Naman Shukla, Counsel appears for

applicant bank.

Defendants are exparte, since, 27.08.2025.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

FINAL ORDER

This original application has been filed by the applicant bank, on 20.L0.202L through Sh. Edmund Pradeep Aind, Manager of the applicant bank, under Section 19 of the RDB Act, 1993 against the defendants for recovery of a sum of Rs.64,00,621.60 along with future and pendent elite interest in the loan account @8.600lo P.a, in CC (Hyp) Facility and @10.05o/o p.a. in Term Loan Facilities from date of filing of this O.A. till the realization in full.

2. The brief facts of the case are that at the request of defendant no.1 through its proprietor defendant no.2, the applicant bank sanctioned a credit facilities i.e., Cash Credit (Hypothecation & BD) of Rs.50,00,000/-, vide s{ ..

TANO.350of 2023 2 sanction letter dated 10.06.2013. The defendants executed all necessary loaning documents on 11.06.2013. The defendant also hypothecated the raw stocks of entire stock of raw material, semi-finished and finished goods including footwear, shoes and allied products and book debts arising out of genuine credit sale transactions acceptable to bank and all receivables arising out of trade transactions another such security acceptable to the applicant bank time to time. Again, at the request of defendant the applicant bank sanctioned a Term Loan Facility of Rs.2,75,000/-.

3. It is further submitted that the defendants enjoyed and utilized the Loan facilities, but failed to maintain the financial discipline and failed to repay the due amounts. The applicant bank requested the defendants to regularize the loan account by visits and letters, but there was no response from the defendants. Hence the account was classified as NPA dated 31.08.2020. The applicant bank served a demand notice dated 17.t0.2020 to the defendants but failed to recover the same Thus, the present O.A.ff.A. is preferred by the applicant bank to recover its dues.

4. On notice by this Tribunal, defendants failed to put appearance at all, despite publication. Accordingly, the defendants were proceeded against exparte on 27.08.2025.

5. The applicant bank has filed evidence by way of affidavit of Shri Edmund Pradeep Aind, Manager of the e; TANO.350of2023 3 applicant bank as Annexure A-1 to Annexure A-13, which have gone unchallenged and un-rebutted. Hence, the case of the applicant stands fully established against the defendants with respect to nonpayment of outstanding amount.

6. After perusing the records, this Tribunal is of the view that the applicant bank has proved its case beyond reasonable doubts. The evidence and documents filed by the applicant bank not rebutted by the defendants by not placing any evidence and there is no question of disbelieving the evidence and documents filed by the applicant bank based upon the written/printed documents. In the light of the above discussions, the present T.A. deserues to be allowed.

ORDER

1) I hereby allow this T.A. of the applicant bank and direct the defendant nos.1 and 2 to pay jointly and severally to the applicant bank within 30 days from today, a sum of Rs.64,00,621.60 along with cost, expenses and interest @10.00o/o from the date of filing of this O.A. which has become T.A till the date of realization.

2) In case of failure to deposit the above amount within the stipulated period, the same shall be recovered from the sale of hypothecated assets. In case of short fall, the same shall be recovered from the sale of personal q.\ - TANO.350of2023 4 movable and immovable assets of the defendant nos.l and 2.

3) Recovery Certificate be issued forthwith and be sent to Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi.

4) The registry of this Tribunal is hereby directed to issue free copy of the order and send the same to both the parties.

5) Parties are directed to appear before the Ld. Recovery Officer, DRT-II, Delhi on 26.10.2026. Pending IAs, if any, stand disPosed of. File be consigned to records. E-\ Date : 24.08.2026 (su sHIL rU-ttnn []hrocI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi This judgement has been signed, dated and pronounced in oPen court. s^ (susHrL KUMAR {AStOcr) PRESIDING OFRCER DRT-II, Delhi Date : 24.08.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead