Calcutta High Court
CRM(A)/671/2026 of JAYDUL HOQUE @ JAIDUL HAK @ ORS Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
Item No.7 AP HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRM ( A ) 671 of 2026 In Re: -
09.10.2026
Court No.7
Item No.7
AP
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
CRM (A) 671 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Sahebganj Police Station Case No.302 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026
under Sections 329(4)/115(2)/117(2)/109/324(4)/326(g)/74/
3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And
In the matter of: Jaydul Hoque @ Jaidul Hak & Ors.
…. Petitioners.
Mr. Hillol Saha Podder
…for the Petitioners.
Mr. Janardan Periwal
Mr. Debanjan Das
Mr. Rajdeep Das
…for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In terms of this Court’s order dated 29th September, 2026 the petitioners visited the Investigating Officer on 3rd October, 2026.
2. The Officer-in-Charge, Sahebganj Police Station, Cooch Behar has filed a report dated 9th October, 2026 and the same is taken on record.
3. It appears from the report that the petitioners did not in any way cooperate with the Investigating Officer.
4. Learned counsel for the State submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is necessary.
5. In the light of the above, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)