Calcutta High Court

CRM(A)/722/2026 of UMESH CHETTRI @ UMESH CHHETRI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL ANR ANR on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 4 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) IN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

24.09.2026 Serial no. 4 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)

IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI FROM PRINCIPAL BENCH (VIO VIDEO CONFERENCE)

CRM (A) 722 of 2026

In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kalimpong Women PS Cse No. 26 of 2026 dated 15.08.2026 u/s 10 of the POCSO Act [Special POCSO Case no. 20/26].

-And-

In the matter of : Umesh Chettri @ Umesh Chhetri

… Petitioner(s)

Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta Mr. Bickey Sharma

… for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Avrojyoti Das, ld. PP Ms. Ruchika Agarwala Mr. Rajdeep Das

… for the State-respondent(s) Ms. Jeenia Rudra Mr. Ujjal Luksom

… for the defacto-complainant

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in connection with the instant case and the complaint was lodged after 24 days. Learned advocate for the defacto-complainant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. State produces the case diary and draws the attention of the court to the statement of the victim under section 183 of the BNSS.

2 I have taken into account the contents of the same and is of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 722 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead