Calcutta High Court
WPA/1121/2025 of MD. MANJUR ALIAS MD. MANJUR SULTAN ALIAS SUJIT KUMAR DUTTA Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS on 18 August 2026
2025,
W.P.A. 1121 of 2025,
A. Roy,J.
Form J(2)
Sl. No. 33
AB
High Court at Calcutta
In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present:
The Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Roy
W.P.A. 1121 of 2025
Md. Manjur alias Md. Manjur Sultan alias Sujit Kumar Dutta
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
For the petitioner
:
Mr. Arnab Sengupta (VC)
For the respondent no. 2-4:
Mr. Pradip Chatterjee
For respondent nos. 5-10 :
Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh
Mr. Ved Rai
Mr. Hrisav Anirban Ghosh
Heard on
:
August 18, 2026
Judgment on :
:
August 18, 2026
[ IN COURT ]
Aniruddha Roy,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service is already on record.
2. The petitioner had previously alleged unauthorized construction on a public land at the behest of the private respondents.
3. Pursuant to the previous direction the issue was considered by the concerned Municipal Corporation when a reasoned order has been passed dated March 3, 2025, annexure P-3 at page 22 to the writ petition
W.P.A. 1046 of 2025, A. Roy,J.
2 wherefrom it appears that, the unauthorized and illegal construction/encroachment has been confirmed. The relevant order is available at page 24 to the writ petition.
4. Parties submit that, there has been no challenge to the said reasoned order dated March 3, 2025 and the reasoned order has been fructified.
5. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that, despite the said reasoned order being there, the Municipal Corporation has not yet taken any step to give any effect in accordance with law.
6. In view of the above, the respondent no. 4 is directed to carry out and complete the direction of the said impugned order dated March 3, 2025 forthwith in accordance with law but positively within four weeks from the date of communication of this order.
7. In the event, any Police assistance is required, jurisdictional Police shall provide all necessary assistance to the respondent no. 4.
8. Since affidavits are not called for, allegations made in this writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents.
9. With the above observations and directions this writ petition being WPA 1121 of 2025 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs.
10. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished expeditiously.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)