Calcutta High Court
WPA/650/2026 of RAJDEEP GUPTA Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS on 17 August 2026
of 2026 A.Roy, J. Form J(2) Sl.No.37 Sc In the High Court at Calcutta In the Circuit Bench
A.Roy, J.
Form J(2)
Sl.No.37
Sc
In the High Court at Calcutta
In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present:
The Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Roy
WPA 650 OF 2026
Rajdeep Gupta
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
For the petitioner
:
Mr. Partha Sarathi Das, Adv. (VC)
Ms. Sudipa Das, Adv.
Ms. Sukanya Bhaumik, Adv.
For the Respondent State
:
Mr. Arijit Ghosh, Adv.
Mr. Samar Rakshit, Adv.
Heard on
:
August 17, 2026
Judgment on
:
August 17, 2026
[In Court]
Aniruddha Roy, J. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Partha Srathi Das, learned Advocate (VC) with Ms. Sukanya Bhaumik, learned Advocate appears for the petitioner.
A.Roy, J.
2. Mr. Arijit Ghosh, learned Advocate with Mr. Samar Rakshit, learned Advocate appears for the respondents State.
3. Referring to the direction of the Hon’ble Division Bench dated December 13, 2024 at page 21 to the writ petition, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that, the direction of the Division Bench was passed in an appeal and the direction has not yet been complied with.
4. Internal page 3 running page 23 of the said Division Bench order shows that, the claim of the present writ petitioner was also taken into consideration by the Hon’ble Division Bench while passing the direction.
5. In view of the above, the respondent no.5 herein is directed to carry out and complete the direction of the Hon’ble Division Bench strictly in accordance with law but positively, peremptorily and mandatorily within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order.
6. It is made clear that, this order has been passed solely on the basis of the direction of the Hon’ble Division Bench to implement it and not beyond that.
7. Since affidavits are not called for, the allegations made in this writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents.
8. With the above observations and directions this writ petition, WPA 650 of 2026 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs.
A.Roy, J.
9. Parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly obtained from the official website of this Court.
10. Photostat certified of this order, if applied for, be furnished expeditiously.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)