Calcutta High Court

WPA/1108/2026 of APARNA SARKAR @ APARNA SARKAR BYAPARI Vs THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME AND HILLS AFFAIRS AND ORS on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026,

A. Roy,J.

Form J(2)

Sl. No. 51

AB

High Court at Calcutta

In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

W.P.A. 1108 of 2026

Aparna Sarkar @ Aparna Sarkar Byapari

Vs.

The Secretary Department of Home and Hill Affairs & Ors.

For the petitioner

:

Mr. Sandip Guha Roy

Mr. Biswajit Das

For the State

:

Mr. Subhankar Dutta

Mr. Tuhin Kumar Roy

Heard on

:

August 13, 2026

Judgment on :

:

August 13, 2026

[ IN COURT ]

Aniruddha Roy,J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. On the prayer of Mr. Subhankar Dutta, learned advocate for the State, time to file report in the form of affidavit stands extended till today. The report filed in Court today is taken on record. Copy has been served upon Mr. Guha Roy, learned advocate for the petitioner in Court today.

A. Roy,J.

2. Petitioner has lodged criminal complaint against the accused. Accused also lodged complaint against the petitioner. Record disclosed before this Court shows Police authority had registered two FIRs before the jurisdictional Police Station arising out of the case and the counter case. Investigation is in active progress. One person namely, Gopal Sardar has been arrested, who is one of the accused leveled by the petitioner.

3. In view of the above, the jurisdictional Police authority shall complete and conclude the investigation forthwith without any unnecessary delay and shall submit the charge sheet before the jurisdictional criminal Court preferably within a period of two months from date.

4. If criminal cases are initiated before the jurisdictional criminal Court, the same shall be proceeded and concluded in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

5. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the charges and counter charges and the investigating authority and the jurisdictional criminal Court, as the case may be, shall be free to decide the issue before it on its own merit in accordance with law.

6. The jurisdictional criminal Court shall not be influenced by the observation, if any, made by this Court.

7. Since affidavits are not called for, the allegations made in this writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents.

A. Roy,J.

8. With the above observations and directions this writ petition being WPA 1108 of 2026 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs.

9. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished expeditiously.

(Aniruddha Roy, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead