Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/245/2026 of SOURAV ROY Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 13 August 2026
Court No.09. (D.Hira) (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
6 13.08.2026
Court
No.09. (D.Hira)
(Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
APPELLATE SIDE
CRM (M) 245 of 2026
In Re: - An application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Sessions Case No. 188 of 2026 pending in the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Jalpaiguri in connection with Rajganj Police Station Case No. 63 of 2026 under Sections 108/107 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending before the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Jalpaiguri.
-
And -
In the matter of: - Sourav Roy.
… petitioner.
Mr. Mayank Bhandari,
Mr. Jagesh Ch. Roy.
Mr. Hrisikesh Roy,
Mr. Debojyoti Roy.
…for the petitioner.
Mr. Satyajit Paul,
Mr. Rounak Ghosh.
… for the defacto complainant
Mr. Avrojyoti Das, ld. APP.,
Mr. Gobinda Ghosh,
Ms. Madhushri Dutta.
… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody for about 164 days. The investigation is complete. Charge-sheet has been submitted. There is no need for further custodial detention of the present petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the defacto complaianant has submitted that the defacto complainant has no objection if the petitioner is granted bail.
3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He has drawn the attention of this Court to the statement of the victim’s father recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
4. After taking into consideration the fact that the investigation is complete, I feel that there is no need for further detention of the present petitioner.
5. In view of the above, the prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed on the following conditions:
a) The petitioner, namely, Sourav Roy, shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand), with two sureties of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each, one of whom must be local to the subject to the satisfaction of Additional District and Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Jalpaiguri.
b) The petitioner shall remain within the geographical limits of Jalpaiguri and he shall not enter Rajganj Police Station.
c) The petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date of hearing and/or as and when to be directed by the Court.
d) The petitioner shall not intimidate or threaten the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and shall not commit any cognizable offence in any manner whatsoever.
e) He shall inform his current local address to the learned Trial Court and the concerned I.O. of this case.
f) The petitioner shall meet the I.C. of the concerned local jurisdictional police station, once in a fortnight, until further order.
6. In the event, the petitioner fail to adhere to any of the conditions stipulated above, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail in accordance with law.
7. The application for bail is, thus, allowed.
8. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
9. Criminal Section is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities.
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)