Calcutta High Court
CRM(A)/571/2026 of MAJNU MIAH Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 30 July 2026
SL No.23 Court No.11 (gc) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
30.07.2026
SL No.23
Court No.11
(gc)
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
CRM (A) 571 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Ghoksadanga Police Station Case No.219 of 2024 dated 11.05.2024 under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
And
In the matter of : Majnu Miah
- Petitioner.
Mr. Hillol Saha Podder,
Ms. Mousumi Das
….For the Petitioner.
Mrs. Panchali Deb Sikder (Nag), Sr. Govt. Adv., Ms. Smita Mitra Sinha, Mr. Rajdeep Das … For the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in connection with Ghoksadanga Police Station Case No.219 of 2024 dated 11.05.2024 under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. It is submitted that no money had been exchanged, and as such allegation of kidnapping and extortion was concocted.
3. Perused the materials on record, the statement of the victim recorded by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, the contents of the charge-sheet and the role of the petitioner in the commission of the alleged offence.
4. As the investigation is over, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail.
2
5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, dismissed.
6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)