Calcutta High Court

CRM(A)/473/2026 of BABURAM SARKAR AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

11 SL No.10 Cp CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

27.07.2026 Ct. No. 11 SL No.10 Cp

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

CRM (A) No. 473 of 2026

In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. 2023, in connection with Sitai Police Station Case No. 222 of 2024, dated 22.11.2024, under Sections 20(a) (i)/29 of the NDPS Act.

And

In the matter of: Baburam Sarkar & Ors.

….Petitioner.

Mr. Sudip Guha …for the Petitioners.

Mr. Avrojyoti Das Ms. Madhushree Dutta Mr. Supritam Nag

… for the State.

Learned advocate for the petitioners fairly submits that this is the second application for pre-arrest bail and the petitioners do not want to proceed with the matter. Under such circumstances, the application is dismissed as not pressed. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead