Calcutta High Court

CRM(A)/526/2026 of HAMIZUL HAQUE MIYA @ HAMIDUL HAQUE Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL No.15 Court No.11 (gc) (Allowed) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH

23.07.2026

SL No.15

Court No.11

(gc)

(Allowed)

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

CRM (A) 526 of 2026

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Falakata Police Station Case No.322 of 2026

dated

15.05.2026

under

Sections

85-80

of

the

BNS

corresponding to GR Case no.1043 of 2026.

And

In the matter of : Hamizul Haque Miya @ Hamidul Haque

- Petitioner.

Mr. Sudip Guha,

Ms. Sayantani Das,

Ms. Ankita Nag

….For the Petitioner.

Mr. Avrojyoti Das, Ld. APP.,

Mr. Gobinda Saha

Mr. Abhilash Mittal

… For the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in connection with Falakata Police Station Case No. 322 of 2026 dated May 15, 2026 under Sections 85-80 of the BNS.

2. Having compared the post-mortem report with the version of the de facto complainant and also taking note of the role of the petitioner who is the father of the FIR named accused, I am inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

3. Accordingly, this Court directs that, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.50,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of

2 whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023. The petitioner shall meet the investigating officer once a week. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Falakata Police Station. The petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

4. In default, the jurisdictional court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail without further reference to this court.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead