Calcutta High Court
CRM(A)/499/2026 of MINU JAISWAL Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 22 July 2026
High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri 22.07.2026 Item No.14 Court No.11
Calcutta High Court
In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri
22.07.2026
Item No.14
Court No.11
(GB)
CRM (A) 499 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kharibari Police Station Case No.224 of 2026 dated 17.06.2026 under Sections 64/61(2)/351(2) of the Bharatiya Naya Sanhita 2023.
And
In the matter of: Minu Jaiswal
….Petitioner.
Mr. Hillol Saha Podder
…for the Petitioner.
Ms. Panchali Deb Sikder,
Mr. Bapi Sarkar,
Mr. Arko Sarkar
… for the State.
Mr. Joydeep Kanta Bhowmik,
Mr. Sayantan Bhowmik,
Mr. Subhankar Kaur,
Ms. Priti Das
… for the de facto complaint.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today, is taken on record.
2. The petitioner is the wife of the principal accused. She prays for pre- arrest bail in connection with Kharibari Police Station Case No.224 of 2026 dated 17.06.2026 under Sections 64/61(2)/351(2) of the Bharatiya Naya Sanhita 2023.
3. It is submitted that the nature of the complaint against the petitioner was that she used to blackmail the victim by referring to a video of the victim and her husband in a compromising position.
4. It appears from the complaint that the relationship between the victim and the principal accused continued for ten years. Although, learned advocate for the de facto complainant submits that the
2 petitioner used to blackmail the victim, this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in the facts of this case, considering the role of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, this Court direct, that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The petitioner will not leave the jurisdictional police station and cooperate with the investigation. In the event the condition is violated, the anticipatory bail will stand automatically cancelled.
6. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 499 of 2026 is, thus, allowed and disposed of.
7. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)