Calcutta High Court
CRM(A)/513/2026 of JITEN KARMAKAR Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 22 July 2026
SL No.27 Court No.11 (gc) (Allowed) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH
22.07.2026
SL No.27
Court No.11
(gc)
(Allowed)
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
CRM (A) 513 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Phansidewa Police Station Case No.296 of 2026
dated 09.06.2026 under Sections 308(2), 318(4), 351(2) of the BNS, 2023.
And
In the matter of : Jiten Karmakar
- Petitioner.
Mr. Nripen Das,
Ms. Sukanya Bhaumik,
Mr. Samrat Acharya
….For the Petitioner.
Mr. Janardan Periwal, Ld. JPP,
Mr. Bijay Bikram Das,
Mr. Roumyadip Saha
… For the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in connection with Phansidewa Police Station Case No. 296 of 2026 dated June 9, 2026 under Sections 308(2), 318(4), 351(2) of the BNS, 2023.
2. Considering the contents of the complaint filed before the police and the time gap between the date of the alleged incident and the date of the complaint, as also the alleged role of the petitioner, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. It appears that there is a political rivalry.
3. Accordingly, this Court directs that, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of
2 Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023. The petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once a week. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Phansidewa Police Station. The petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.
4. In default, the jurisdictional court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail without further reference to this court.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)